This was inspired by Brian's comment on my last one. I'm just a puzzling machine. Please let me know, again, if you find more than one unique solution or a contradiction in my clues. Edit: Some minor corrections have been made based on comments.
This is the tale of six brothers: Arnold, Barry, Chester, David, Edward, and Frank. None of them are twins, and each of them has a whole-number age. What are the brothers' ages?
1. Frank is two years older than Barry.
2. Edward is half Chester's age.
3. David is two-thirds Arnold's age.
4. Half of the brothers can legally drink in the US.
5. None of the brothers has reached retirement age.
6. Two of the brothers' ages are prime numbers. Frank's age isn't one of them.
7. David was born between Edward and Barry.
8. Chester is the oldest, Arnold is second-oldest.
9. Barry is six years older than Edward.
This is the tale of six brothers: Arnold, Barry, Chester, David, Edward, and Frank. None of them are twins, and each of them has a whole-number age. What are the brothers' ages?
1. Frank is two years older than Barry.
2. Edward is half Chester's age.
3. David is two-thirds Arnold's age.
4. Half of the brothers can legally drink in the US.
5. None of the brothers has reached retirement age.
6. Two of the brothers' ages are prime numbers. Frank's age isn't one of them.
7. David was born between Edward and Barry.
8. Chester is the oldest, Arnold is second-oldest.
9. Barry is six years older than Edward.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-29 12:11 pm (UTC)Yup, same answers as above. I don't like these "analog" puzzles as much as the "discrete" puzzles such as the class/level puzzle before, but that's just my personal preference. I hate numbers and basically math in general.
I wonder, though. Is there a way to solve this without resorting to guesswork and "plug-and-chugging" at some point? The way I solve these puzzles is I deduce as much as I can from the information provided, and if I'm unable to prove firmly one or more of the values, I start picking reasonable values for an important variable (in this case, Barry's age, since knowing that opened up a world of information) and seeing if they fall into place. Did anyone actually solve this without resorting to this method? And if so, please share the process.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 04:09 am (UTC)11-17
13-19
17-23
Test from there. But then note that 2 more than the higher number (Frank) has to be composite, so the only set that works is 13-19-21. Test and check that it works.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 03:49 pm (UTC)